On 02/13/2017 10:56 PM, Arif Khokar wrote:
I wasn't aware of that expectation. My idea was to use NNTP as a way to
facilitate the development of a new git utility that would serve as the
inverse of git-send-email (sort of like the relationship between git
format-patch and git am), rather than
On 02/13/2017 11:41 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Arif Khokar <arif.i.kho...@gmail.com> writes:
One concern I have regarding this idea is whether or not SMTP servers
typically replace a Message-Id header set by the client.
The clients are supposed to give Message-IDs, but because some
c
Arif Khokar <arif.i.kho...@gmail.com> writes:
> One concern I have regarding this idea is whether or not SMTP servers
> typically replace a Message-Id header set by the client.
The clients are supposed to give Message-IDs, but because some
clients fail to do so, SMTP server imp
Hi Arif,
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Arif Khokar wrote:
> On 08/25/2016 09:01 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Arif Khokar wrote:
>
> >>> I considered recommending this as some way to improve the review
> >>> process. The problem, o
On 02/13/2017 02:21 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Arif Khokar <arif.i.kho...@gmail.com> writes:
... I
still think it would be better to be able to list the message-id
values in the header or body of the cover letter message of a patch
series (preferably the former) in order to faci
Hi Arif,
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Arif Khokar wrote:
> On 08/24/2016 09:04 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Philip Oakley wrote:
>
> >> I do note that dscho's patches now have the extra footer (below the
> >> three dashes) e.g.
> &
Arif Khokar <arif.i.kho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02/13/2017 09:37 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >I actually had expected *you* to put in a little bit of an effort, too. In
> >fact, I was very disappointed that you did not even look into porting that
> >script
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:41:51PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Arif Khokar <arif.i.kho...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > One concern I have regarding this idea is whether or not SMTP servers
> > typically replace a Message-Id header set by the client.
>
> The client
Arif Khokar <arif.i.kho...@gmail.com> writes:
> ... I
> still think it would be better to be able to list the message-id
> values in the header or body of the cover letter message of a patch
> series (preferably the former) in order to facilitate downloading the
> patche
On 02/13/2017 09:37 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi Arif,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Arif Khokar wrote:
Thanks for the link. One thing that comes to mind that is that it may
be better to just download the patches and then manually apply them
afterwords rather than doing it in the script itself
On 02/10/2017 11:10 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi Arif,
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
I recently adapted an old script I had to apply an entire patch series
given the GMane link to its cover letter:
https://github.com/git-for-windows/build-extra/blob/master/apply-from
Hi Arif,
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Arif Khokar wrote:
> On 08/20/2016 03:57 PM, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>
> > But perhaps the problem is current lack of tooling in the opposite
> > direction, namely getting patches from mailing list and applying them
> > to GitHub repo,
Hi Arif,
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Arif Khokar wrote:
>
> > On 08/20/2016 03:57 PM, Jakub Narębski wrote:
> >
> > > But perhaps the problem is current lack of tooling in the opposite
> > > direction, name
Hi Arif,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Arif Khokar wrote:
> On 02/10/2017 11:10 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > > I recently adapted an old script I had to apply an entire patch
> > > series give
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Arif,
>
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Arif Khokar wrote:
>
> > On 08/20/2016 03:57 PM, Jakub Narębski wrote:
> >
> > > But perhaps the problem is current lack of tooling in the opposite
> > >
15 matches
Mail list logo