Mark, Since REST is an architectural style based on resource abstractions does it fulfill the first criteria.....I guess the resources are exposed as services through a uniform interface.
What's you take cheers </jima> Mark Baker wrote: > On 6/29/06, Anne Thomas Manes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> I list two fundamental principles: >>- service-orientation >>- loose coupling > > > Sweet! By these measures alone, REST is a better SOA than WS. It's > probably a toss-up wrt service-orientation, but REST is clearly more > loosely coupled than WS because it separates the concerns of interface > and implementation far better... as we've discussed before; > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/message/3427 > > Mark. > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/2pRQfA/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/NhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
