On 7/4/06, Dan Creswell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So can you please provide a sketch of how you'd recommend people solve > this problem in the context of stateless messaging?
Well, there's many ways one could do it, but as a very simple example, I could send each message with an HTTP header that said, say, "Transaction: 91023123", indicating that those messages were to be considered part of the transaction #91023123. >From a REST perspective, what matters is that the meaning of the message is independent of the state of the transaction, unlike with a session based transaction. Mark. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design. http://us.click.yahoo.com/XISQkA/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/NhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
