Pat:

 

No problem, it just shows how old I am getting in the business if I can remember things like that – of course the fact I still have a memory that works to remember that in the first place might be an indication I have a few more years left!!  What do you think, Al

 

TOM

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 7:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: old Dynamic iron head

 

Tom,

  Thank you for your reply on this matter. I meant to say it earlier but I hit the send button by accident and away it went.

Pat McGoldrick On Target Golf

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:39 PM

Subject: Re: ShopTalk: old Dynamic iron head

 

You know the saying: you learn something new everyday

----- Original Message -----

From: Tom Wishon

Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 11:23 AM

Subject: RE: ShopTalk: old Dynamic iron head

 

Pat:

 

I can answer that one – The model #2003 Dynamic weighted investment cast irons from the Golfsmith 2004 catalog was a model that I inherited and did not design.  I came to GS in May of 2003 and while a lot of the new models for 2004 were my first designs for the company, this one was a carry over from before.  But I know and remember the model.  The reason that it is so easy to bend is two fold.  For one, this is a fully offset iron in the area of 7-8mm of offset that also has a thin dimension at the very base of the hosel where the hosel curves into the blade.  That means far less thickness of metal to have to bend and less resistance for the force of bending for loft and lie.  Second, most iron designs that have such offset and such a thin base of hosel area are normally investment cast from 17-4 stainless so that there is less chance of the thin area down at the base of the hosel happening to bend from hard “fat shots” or hard hits behind the ball on a driving range mat.  This one was done in 431, which while much more resistant to bending that a softer stainless like 18-8 or 303/304, will then have far less resistance to your loft and lie bending because of the thin hosel section area.   So when you look at ANY iron and evaluate it for ease or difficulty of bending, the first thing is the material but just as important is the design of the area of the head where the bending has to take place.  Anytime you have considerable offset on an ironhead, you will almost always get a much thinner dimensional section where the base of the hosel fans into the blade so this will mean easier bendability, but that can be counteracted if the head were to be made from a much less ductile material.  In this case you have a slightly more ductile steel with 431 combined with the thinner base of hosel section so that you get easy bending even though you are thinking of 431 being tougher to bend from your experience with other iron models. 

 

There is also one more thing that comes into play for sure and that is the heat treatment process that is used on the steel from whatever foundry made the heads.  Virtually all metals used in the manufacture of ironheads will change their mechanical properties depending on the heat treatment process that is employed after the head is formed.  Normally, if you choose a heat treatment procedure that uses lower heat, you get higher strengths and with that, less elongation or ductility of the metal for the heads would be more difficult to bend.  Or if you use a heat treatment process that uses higher temperatures in the ovens, you get lower strengths and a lot more elongation and ductility and the heads will be very easy to bend.  For example, with common 17-4 stainless if the heat treatment is done at 900degs C, you can push the yield strength up to 180,000 psi and with that, the elongation down to under 15% which would mean you would have a heckuva time getting a 1 degree bend.  But if you do the heat treat up at 1150 degrees C, you would lower the yield strength to 85,000 psi and move the elongation up over 22%, which would make it bend pretty easy in comparison.  Most foundries use a common std heat treatment unless the designer of the heads specifically tells them what he wants.  Therefore, the ease of bending on these had to be because of the normal 431 bendability being reduced in your feel by the much thinner base of hosel area in the head’s design. 

 

Hope this helps,

 

TOM W

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 6:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ShopTalk: old Dynamic iron head

 

I asked this question about a week ago and don't know if it ever went thru, if it did, my apologies. Ten years ago I built my first set of clubs with Golfsmith's Dynamic weighted irons Model #2003 from the 1994 catalog. Recently I left my PW out on the course and whom ever found it never turned it in to the club house. Would anyone out there have one or know where I could get one? If anyone is familiar with this model( aside from Tom Wishon ), this iron is 431SS with a floating firing pin and it is VERY SOFT and Easley bendable up to at least 5*. First club I ever lost and I would like to keep as a set if possible. TIA

Question--Tom or anyone else? Could anyone explain why this Iron is so easily bendable? Is it because it has a 2" long hosel?    

Pat McGoldrick On Target Golf

Reply via email to