Bruce, this discussion would be better on the Buddhist Debate Group. And please watch your language. I am glad you have not called me a "spic" yet. Alas, the people on the Buddhist Debate Group have beaten you to it.
- James B. On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Bruce A. Metcalf <brmetc...@comcast.net> wrote: > On 09/09/2015 11:07 PM, James Bonilla wrote: > > P.P.S. I have answers for everything. >> > > If this is so, then why do you trouble yourself in discussion with others, > who could, by definition, add nothing to your understanding? > > I would think that if I had answers for everything, I should say very > little except to quote prices for my answers and wait for the world to come > sit at my feet and toss coins in rapturous admiration. > > Alas, I have had my IQ rated at only 172, so perhaps this burden of > additional brainpower has obliged me to question even my own answers. > > But then, you didn't say that your answers were correct, and that would > certainly make such a task far easier. > > / Bruce / > > P.S. Thanks for coming here and stirring the shit so effectively; it > should provide impetus for many interesting discussions. Only, did you have > to use such a very large paddle? > >
