I do not get the same response as you do. If a non-vm user dials the message button they are prompted for the exension first, rather than a voicemail password.
Which is the desired response so non-vm users can check shared or other vm boxes. If I type in the ext of a non-vm user then I get an "invalid" response. Now, as to Kumaran issue, that seems like a great improvement. Perhaps something as easy as an option that enables a forward to an AA when there is no vm box. Then that AA can have any message or option the admin chooses. -M >>> Max DiOrio 08/04/11 6:25 AM >>> I have a question in a similar vein. If voicemail is disabled for a user and they press the message key and enter a password, it just says that the password is invalid. By disabling the voicemail, are we just setting an impossible to guess vm password on the box, or actually disabling voicemail for that user? I'd like it to say "this extension does not have a voicemail box." or something similar. Sent from my iPad On Aug 4, 2011, at 6:00 AM, Kumaran T wrote: > Hi All, > If Vm is disabled for the user 200.And some other user calls 8200 > to deposit a VM the prompt will be played "The extensions is not > valid.Thank u good bye".So this prompt will create confusion whether the > extension is valid or not.So I hope changing the prompt will a better > idea like "The extension does not contain VM permission.Thank u good bye" > > -- > --Regards,-- > --Venkateshwaran T-- > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
_______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
