Thanks George.  

 

so from this directory I would just do a yum update of those two files then?

 

From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of George Niculae
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 2:57 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Lastest Patches and Alias

 

Ah, you should try from here

http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs-stage/4.4.0/CentOS_5/i386/

George
On Sep 30, 2012 12:18 AM, "Todd Hodgen" <thod...@frontier.com> wrote:
>
> This might be a problem, as I believe the site is a 32-bit installation.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of George
Niculae
> Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 12:49 PM
> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Lastest Patches and Alias
>
> Todd,
>
> you should yum update sipxregistry and sipxconfig from here for the
moment,
> they contain changes reverted:
>
> http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs-stage/4.4.0/CentOS_5/x86_64/
>
> George
>
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Todd Hodgen <thod...@frontier.com>
wrote:
> > Sorry I don't.
> >
> > This is unfortunate, as it creates service issues for this site.
> >
> > This brings up a concern with this patching process that is being used.
> > Yum update pulls in all of the patches, and has the potential of
> > bringing in patches that are not fully vetted and regression tested to
> working sites.
> >
> > I wish there was a different method of ensuring you know exactly what
> > patches you are putting into a system, along with a method of removing
> > them should there be an issue.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> > [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of George
> > Niculae
> > Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 3:43 AM
> > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Lastest Patches and Alias
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Todd Hodgen <thod...@frontier.com>
wrote:
> >> I haven't dug into it yet, but will in morning.  Last night I did a
> >> Yum Update to a site that was running on 4.4, with a Patton Gateway
> >> to
> > PRI.
> >> Everything was running well, but the certificate was about to expire.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Here are the steps I took -
> >>
> >> Stopped sipxecs
> >>
> >> Yum Update to get the latest patches
> >>
> >> Started sipxecs
> >>
> >> Logged in and Sent profiles for the server
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Did backup of system
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Stopped sipxecs
> >>
> >> Followed instruction from Wiki for creating a new Certificate - as
> >> this one was going to run out 10/8/2012.
> >>
> >> Started sipxecs
> >>
> >> Logged in and sent profiles for the server.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I tried to restart all of the phones, but only some did a restart.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Otherwise, everything okay.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Today, I discovered calls to the auto-attendant are processing fine.
> >> However, calls to DID numbers - which are all aliases on this system
> >> are not.  Thought maybe related to certificates, so I factory reset
> >> two of the phones with this issue, no joy.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Have I missed an issue with the latest patches for 4.4, or is anyone
> >> else seeing a similar issue on 4.4 with latest patches.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Yes, I know, hard to tell without a trace - I'll get it in the
> >> morning, but curious if anyone else has discovered an issue like this
> >> - possibly a new configuration items I am not aware of?
> >>
> >
> > Todd,
> >
> > there could be a problem with latest update19 - we noticed same
> > problem last night. Until we figure it out, do you have any mean to
> > downgrade sipregistrar /config to patch 18?
> >
> > George
> > _______________________________________________
> > sipx-users mailing list
> > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sipx-users mailing list
> > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to