Thanks Pete.

Jack Iafret
"Keeper of the Nostalgia Rules"
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pete Olsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ed Berris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jack Womack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 8:29 PM
Subject: RE: [RCSE] Legionair Questions


> Ed,
>
> If a person desires to take part in an event, that person
> obtains the rules and regulations for that event.  To
> participate in the event, one must follow the rules, or be
> judged downward or eliminated for not following the rules.
>
> If a person desires to get the rules/regulations changes,
> then that person should become an active participant in the
> regulating body.  Then and only then can one have input to
> get rules changed.
>
> If a person doesn't agree with the rules, there is the
> option to not participate.
>
> Make the choices, then act.
>
> Thermals,
>
> Pete Olsen, AMA CD
> SWSA
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Berris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 2:49 PM
> To: Jack Womack; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [RCSE] Legionair Questions
>
> The idea that rules for Nostalgia class would be enforced
> at the level that
> Jack Iafret states seems quite silly.  Isn't the idea of a
> Nostalgia class
> to bring fun to those fliers that appreciate the older
> STYLED aircraft and
> like a  more relaxed flying experience?
>
> It seems that all hobbies have those that like making and
> enforcing rules
> just a little too much.  What possible difference could a
> boom made from
> aluminum, fiberglass or carbon make.
>
> I remember going to a vintage car club meeting where photos
> of beautifully
> restored cars were being shown.  There was a small group of
> members who were
> critical of a particular car because the bolts used under
> the hood were not
> the exact ones used in the year that car was produced.
> Another car was down
> graded by these same fellows because the color of the car
> was slightly off
> from the color charts for that year.
>
> I remember thinking these guys are way too serious.  Here
> were these
> beautiful 1930's vintage cars and instead of appreciating
> seeing them
> restored and being driven they were put off by these small
> "inaccuracies".
>
> Jack, you may be the keeper of the rules but I have a
> feeling that some day
> someone might just tell you to keep your set of rules.
> Frame them, have
> them embroidered on your pillow case or have the rules
> painted on your
> walls.  But for me and a lot of other guys like me we'll
> build the
> re-introduced Legionair and other designs with some updates
> that make a
> great model even better.   We'll have our own NOSTALGIA
> class.  After all
> Jack, the idea is to have fun. Right?
> Ed
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jack Womack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 4:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [RCSE] Legionair Questions
>
>
> > I guess as a CD, those written rules are there for
> > interpretation. The way I interpret them, the carbon
> > boom would be no different than adding carbon to a
> > spar, or replacing the spar system, or changing the
> > joiner system and subsequently having to change the
> > dihedral angle. The spirit of these rules says to me
> > that as long as the outline, airfoils, and basic
> > flavor of the aircraft aren't altered, that such mods
> > are welcome. If it's that strict, why not just make it
> > strictly as designed with absolutely no structural
> > alterations allowed, and let it go at that. That would
> > forgo any arguments...unless of course the model is
> > covered in opaque Monokote... By the way, Texas heat
> > isn't good for most epoxy systems, so my boom would be
> > painted white. How would you know if it's carbon or
> > aluminum?
> >
> > Jack Womack
> >
> >  --- Jack Iafret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > For it to be truly Nostalgia legal the boom would
> > > have to be the same as the
> > > original. The rules state that the basic building
> > > materials must be same as
> > > the original.
> > >
> > > Jack Iafret
> > > "Keeper of the Nostalgia Rules"
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Wes Gibson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "RCSE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jack Womack"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 12:25 AM
> > > Subject: [RCSE] Legionair Questions
> > >
> > >
> > > > Jack,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for all the good information on the
> > > Legionair. I do have a few more
> > > > questions though. First you mentioned that your
> > > 100 is a floater with
> > > > attitude. Could you please clarify what kind of
> > > attitude this sailplane
> > > has?
> > > > Jim Early mentioned that the Legionair is fast.
> > > Does it handle poorly at
> > > > slower airspeeds? I am also concerned about the
> > > aluminum boom. Does this
> > > > boom hold up in rough landings? Would it be better
> > > to go to a fiberglass
> > > or
> > > > carbon fiber boom? Lastly, is the Legionair
> > > nostalgia legal?
> > > >
> > > > Right now, the Legionair is number one on my list
> > > of possible kits to
> > > build
> > > > with the Viking coming in a very close second. Do
> > > you have any idea when
> > > Ray
> > > > Hayes will have the Legionair ready for release?
> > > This is a rather far
> > > > fetched question, but what would you expect the
> > > kits to sale for?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again.
> > > >
> > > > Wes Gibson
> > > > AMA #607029
> > > > LSF #7533
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Jack Womack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "Wes Gibson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 7:29 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [RCSE] Question for any RES,
> > > Nostalgia and Woodcrafter
> > > > pilotsout there
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Wes,
> > > > >
> > > > > There's very few differences in the Legionair
> > > 140,
> > > > > 100, and 132. They all use the same set of tip
> > > ribs
> > > > > with different sweep and rib spacing, and the
> > > main
> > > > > panels are basically the same except for the
> > > number of
> > > > > ribs and spacing. The 140 used a 3/4" aluminum
> > > boom,
> > > > > while the other 2 used a 1/2" boom. The tail
> > > design
> > > > > was specific to each due to differing wing
> > > areas. The
> > > > > area for the 140 is 1325 sq. in. with about a 64
> > > oz.
> > > > > target weight. The 132 had about 1250 sq.in. and
> > > the
> > > > > 100 had about 985 sq. in. I am guessing at the
> > > 132 as
> > > > > I didn't go through my plans collection yet. My
> > > 100
> > > > > inch Legionair weighs 39 oz. and is a floater
> > > with an
> > > > > attitude. You can see my Legionairs on the
> > > Skybench
> > > > > site.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Grand Esprit is a model from the same era
> > > and
> > > > > quite a good one at that. I am building another
> > > one
> > > > > soon. Go to the Dreamcatcher website and look in
> > > short
> > > > > kits for the Grand Esprit. The carbon boom is a
> > > nice
> > > > > touch. I built one and, as I said, am building
> > > > > another, soon.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope that helps.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jack Womack
> > > > > Conroe, Texas
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system
> > > (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > > > Version: 6.0.518 / Virus Database: 316 - Release
> > > Date: 9/11/03
> > > >
> > > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane
> > > News.  Send "subscribe"
> > > and "unsubscribe" requests to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
> > > subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in
> > > text only format with
> > > MIME turned off.
> > > >
> > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane
> > > News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests
> > > to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
> > > subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in
> > > text only format with MIME turned off.
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design
> software
> > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
> > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.
> Send "subscribe"
> and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please note that
> subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text
> only format with
> MIME turned off.
> >
>
> RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send
> "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and
> unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
> MIME turned off.
>
>


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.

Reply via email to