Sorry. Same channel = problems for both
Though a good Rx can outperform a poor one and therefore be the one still in
the air.
Also if the guy with the good Rx is closer to his plane or have a better
Tx/antenna he can have control longer than the one with a slightly offset
Tx/short antenna/poor antenna
PCM versus PPM have nothing or little effect on range or better performance.
What PCM does better is giving you the right movement without any jittering.
The PPM system actually gives better range but with some jitter possible.
The difference you see at the "tests" are because the whole receiver is
built up in a better way.
I have never tested the R700 in a contest so I cant tell if it will be good.
Tested it in a electric seaplane though and it was good.
Hilsen (Regards) Jojo
NEW: www.jojoen.no
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:55:15 -0500
From: Ed Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Soaring@airage.com
Subject: Re: Soaring V1 #6983
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jim Laurel,
I read your informal test of PCM vs. PPM on your JR radio. I have never
heard
that you could avoid channel conflict by using a PCM receiver. Failsafe
and,
perhaps faster or more solid signal handling were what I heard. Can
anyone
confirm this ability of a PCM receiver to ignore a PPM signal on the same
channel? Could be a good reason for me to consider using PCM. I never
had a
good reason before.
Ed Anderson
aeajr on the forums
Long Island Silent Flyers
www.lisf.org
------------------------------
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format
