Interesting, I managed to do Solr SQL On 16 August 2016 at 12:22, Joe Lawson <jlaw...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> The sad part of doing plain old REST requests is you basically miss out on > all the SolrCloud features that are inherent in client call optimization > and collection discovery. It would be nice if some companies made /contrib > offerings for different languages that could be better maintained. > > Most REST clients are stuck in a pre-SolrCloud world or master/slave > configuration and that paradigm is going away. > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:43 AM, GW <thegeofo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The client that comes with PHP is lame. If installed you should > un-install > > php5-solr and install the Pecl/Pear libs which are good to the end of 5.x > > and 6.01. It tanks with 6.1. > > > > I defer to my own effort of changing everything to plain old REST > requests. > > > > On 16 August 2016 at 10:39, GW <thegeofo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > As long as you are .NET you will be last in line. You try using the > REST > > > API. All you get with a .NET/C# lib is a wrapper for the REST API. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 16 August 2016 at 09:08, Joe Lawson <jlawson@ > > opensourceconnections.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> All I have seen is SolrNET, forks of SolrNET and people using > RestSharp. > > >> > > >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Eirik Hungnes <hung...@rubrikk.no> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hi > > >> > > > >> > I have been looking around for a library for .NET / C#. We are > > currently > > >> > using SolrNet, but that is ofc not as well equipped as SolrJ, and > have > > >> > heard rumors occasionally about someone, also Lucene, has been > working > > >> on a > > >> > port to other languages? > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Best regards, > > >> > > > >> > Eirik > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> -Joe > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > -Joe >
