On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Grant
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Grant Likely wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:33:14 +0100, Linus Walleij <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > The SPI subsystem core now manages message queues internally. Remove the
>> > > local message queue implementation from the spi-bitbang driver and
>> > > migrate to the common one.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > This is great stuff!
>> > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > (Since I've never really used the bitbang driver I wouldn't trust me to
>> > do any deeper review.)
>>
>> In hindsite; I should have asked you to make the pl driver use bitbang
>> queueing since that was already used for generic queuing by a number
>> of drivers; and then refactored that to perform better.  Doing that
>> would have been refactoring better tested code, but oh well.
>>
>> I'm going to ignore this series for the moment; please remind me to
>> look at it after the merge window has closed.
>
> Seems to be time:-)

Yeah lets ping Grant on this :)

Yours,
Linus Walleij

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
spi-devel-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general

Reply via email to