SPRINGers, this is the updated version after Stephane and Sasha comments about path disjointness.
Let me know if it captures correctly the outcome of our discussion. Thanks. s. > On Oct 11, 2016, at 11:57 AM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking of the > IETF. > > Title : Resiliency use cases in SPRING networks > Authors : Clarence Filsfils > Stefano Previdi > Pierre Francois > Bruno Decraene > Rob Shakir > Filename : draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-07.txt > Pages : 11 > Date : 2016-10-11 > > Abstract: > This document identifies and describes the requirements for a set of > use cases related to network resiliency on Segment Routing (SPRING) > networks. > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-07 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-07 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
