NFPA 13:3.3.24 Thermal Barrier.   A material that limits the average 
temperature rise of the unexposed surface to not more than 250°F (139°C) above 
ambient for a specified fire exposure duration using the standard 
time-temperature curve of ASTM E 119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of 
Building Construction and Materials. Granted, 11.1.2 does not require a 
'thermal' barrier, but a barrier nonetheless.

Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 11th edition

Definition of BARRIER
1a : something material that blocks or is intended to block passage
b: a natural formation or structure that prevents or hinders movement or action

Definition of PARTITION
1: the action of parting : the state of being parted : division
2: something that divides; especially : an interior dividing wall
3: one of the parts or sections of a whole

A beam is not a barrier or partition, nor is a beam capable of preventing heat 
from a fire in one area from fusing sprinklers in the adjacent area 
(11.1.2(2)). Considering a fire plume expands approx.. 22° as it moves upwards, 
a beam will not likely collect all of the heat on one side of the beam, even if 
it is 15 ft away.

Duane Johnson, PE
Program Manager
Division of the Fire Marshal (Contractor)
Office of Research Services 
National Institutes of Health 
301-496-0487

"Protecting Science - One Sprinkler at a Time"


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 2:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: NFPA 13: 11.1.2 (separation between hazards)

Can the combustion gases accumulate and migrate below the 18" beam into the 
adjacent space?  Depending on fuel loading, very good possibility.  A barrier 
or partition from floor to ceiling creates a physical separation.

Look at the specific wording in A.11.1.2 where is talks about a wall or 
partition.  

A soffit or lintel is not the same as a wall or partition.  A soffit (extension 
downward from the ceiling, like a deep beam) only creates a limited visual 
separation between spaces, not a complete physical separation.

Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection 
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension  74102
[email protected]



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ralphy 
Henderson
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 1:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: NFPA 13: 11.1.2 (separation between hazards)

But it doesn't say a wall... it says "a barrier or partition capable of 
delaying heat". Isn't the intent to basically have a compartment capable of 
containing the heat in one area and ensuring only the sprinklers in the 
compartment operate? In dealing w/ compartments it is acceptable to have 
openings into other areas as long as the minimum lintel depth is met. This beam 
is basically an 18" lintel separating the two areas.




----- Original Message -----
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: 
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 10:48 AM
Subject: RE: NFPA 13: 11.1.2 (separation between hazards)

A barrier for separation is a wall, not just a beam.

Craig L. Prahl, CET
Fire Protection
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension  74102
[email protected]



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ron 
Greenman
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 1:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: NFPA 13: 11.1.2 (separation between hazards)

I don't think so. If you have two separate hazard classes you'd need to extend 
the higher into the lower the requisite number of feet (I have 16 in my head 
but I'm not trusting memory) and to both sides.


On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Ralphy Henderson
<[email protected]>wrote:

> (NFPA 13: 11.1.2 - 2013 ed)
>
> I have a situation where there is a 12 ft. opening leading from one 
> hazard area to another but the opening has an 18" steel wide flange 
> beam running along it. I'm wondering if this 18" beam would suffice to 
> adequately contain the heat in the separate areas since NFPA 13 
> doesn't elaborate on the qualifications for such a barrier from what I can 
> tell...
>
> thx,
>
> RB
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org
>



--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima Ave.
Tacoma, WA 98405

[email protected]

http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/

253.680.7346
253.576.9700 (cell)

Member:
ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC, WFSC

They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis Bacon, 
essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626) 
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to