On May 23, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Brandon Goldfedder wrote:
>
> Michael,
> Yes - that is what I am doing now :
> ForeignKey("schemaname.tablename.colname")
>
> and I have things working. (see example 3).
> My problem is these steps
> seem really ugly and a lot more work than it should be to get things
> working portably and reliably - thus my question on if this is best
> practice or not.
no, what you had there is crazy. send an example case (just the plain
tables and their relationships, none of the "extra" stuff you did) so
we can fully see what you'd like to achieve.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
