thank you , this was an old ticket #709 and is fixed in r4814 of the 0.4 branch and r4813 of trunk. remove the usage of "owner", it is synonymous with "schema" (as it is in oracle itself - http://www.dba-oracle.com/t_schema_components_owner_user.htm ) , as well as all the other hacks.
On May 24, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Brandon Goldfedder wrote: > > > MIchael, > > Thanks for your help on this - I agree I want to get beyond a mess > here regardless if it is 'working' .... > > Here are 3 tables that demostrate the issues (with the changes I > needed to do use_alter, modify schema.py, hardcode in schema name to > ForeignKey and tables). I want the model file below to work regardless > of the database target (so the schema cram and Oracle target need to > be separated) > > The problem is that there is already a table in another schema called > 'app_user' and 'facility' so check tables is finding them... > > Also - you will note the ForeignKey generates an invalid ix_* index > for Oracle so I needed to modify schema.py until I get around to > setting index=False and manually creating Index'es > > > > > > #!/usr/bin/env python > # > > # Copyright (c) 2008 Digital Innovation, Inc. All rights reserved. > # > # The information and source code contained herein is the exclusive > property of > # Digital Innovation Inc (dicorp) and may not be disclosed, > examined, or > # reproduced in whole or in part without the explicit written > authorization from dicorp. > # > # > > from datetime import datetime > from elixir import Entity, Field, OneToMany, ManyToOne, ManyToMany, > has_field, belongs_to > from elixir import options_defaults, using_options, setup_all, > using_table_options > from elixir import String, Unicode, Integer, DateTime, SmallInteger, > Boolean, Text, Binary, Float > > options_defaults['table_options'] = {'schema':'cram','owner':'cram'} > > from sqlalchemy import Sequence, CheckConstraint, Index, > ForeignKeyConstraint, ForeignKey, schema > > class Facility(Entity): > using_options(tablename='facility') > #using_table_options(schema='cram',owner='cram') > control_number = Field(Integer, > Sequence('facility_control_number_seq'), primary_key = True, > autoincrement = True, nullable = False) > id = Field(String(20), nullable = False) > name = Field(String(50), nullable = False) > description = Field(String(255), nullable = True) > url = Field(String(255), nullable = True) > type_link = Field(Integer, CheckConstraint('type_link >= 0'), > nullable = False) > #TODO: UNIQUE Index IdUniqueKey > > class PropertyItem(Entity): > using_options(tablename='property_item') > #using_table_options(schema='cram',owner='cram') > control_number = Field(Integer, Sequence('property_item_cn_seq'), > primary_key = True, autoincrement = True, nullable = False) > created_by = Field(Integer, > ForeignKey('cram.app_user.control_number', name = > 'property_item_created_by_fk', use_alter = False), nullable = True, > index = True) #Link field for link CreatedBy > created_when = Field(DateTime, nullable = True) > modified_by = Field(Integer, > ForeignKey('cram.app_user.control_number', name = > 'property_item_modified_by_fk', use_alter = False), nullable = True, > index = True) #Link field for link ModifiedBy > modified_when = Field(DateTime, nullable = True) > property_profile_link = Field(Integer, > ForeignKey('cram.property_profile.control_number', name = > 'property_item_3_fk', use_alter = False), nullable = False, index = > True) #Link field for link PropertyProfileLink > code = Field(String(50), nullable = False) > description = Field(String(50), nullable = True) > sort_order = Field(SmallInteger, CheckConstraint('sort_order >= > 0'), nullable = True) > disabled = Field(Boolean, nullable = True) > > class PropertyProfile(Entity): > using_options(tablename='property_profile') > #using_table_options(schema='cram',owner='cram') > control_number = Field(Integer, > Sequence('property_profile_cn_seq'), primary_key = True, autoincrement > = True, nullable = False) > primary_facility_link = Field(Integer, > ForeignKey('cram.facility.control_number', name = > 'property_profile_1_fk', use_alter = False), nullable = True, index = > True) #Link field for link PrimaryFacilityLink > created_by = Field(Integer, > ForeignKey('cram.app_user.control_number', name = > 'property_profile_created_by_fk', use_alter = False), nullable = True, > index = True) #Link field for link CreatedBy > created_when = Field(DateTime, nullable = True) > modified_by = Field(Integer, > ForeignKey('cram.app_user.control_number', name = > 'property_profile_3_fk', use_alter = False), nullable = True, index = > True) #Link field for link ModifiedBy > modified_when = Field(DateTime, nullable = True) > name = Field(String(50), nullable = False) > description = Field(String(255), nullable = True) > active = Field(Boolean, nullable = True) > > class AppUser(Entity): > using_options(tablename='app_user') > #using_table_options(schema='cram',owner='cram') > control_number = Field(Integer, > Sequence('app_user_control_number_seq'), primary_key = True, > autoincrement = True, nullable = False) > primary_facility_link = Field(Integer, > ForeignKey('cram.facility.control_number', name = 'app_user_1_fk', > use_alter = False), nullable = True, index = True) #Link field for > link PrimaryFacilityLink > id = Field(String(20), nullable = False) > name = Field(String(50), nullable = False) > description = Field(String(255), nullable = True) > url = Field(String(255), nullable = True) > email_address = Field(String(255), nullable = True) > expiration_date = Field(DateTime, nullable = True) > password = Field(String(40), nullable = False) > disabled = Field(Boolean, nullable = True) > #TODO: UNIQUE Index IdUniqueKey > > > setup_all() > create_all(checkfirst=False) > > > On May 24, 9:57 am, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On May 23, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Brandon Goldfedder wrote: >> >> >> >>> Michael, >>> Yes - that is what I am doing now : >>> ForeignKey("schemaname.tablename.colname") >> >>> and I have things working. (see example 3). >>> My problem is these steps >>> seem really ugly and a lot more work than it should be to get things >>> working portably and reliably - thus my question on if this is best >>> practice or not. >> >> no, what you had there is crazy. send an example case (just the >> plain >> tables and their relationships, none of the "extra" stuff you did) so >> we can fully see what you'd like to achieve. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---