On Sep 19, 2008, at 1:24 PM, Sam Widmer wrote:
> Thanks for the responses so far. > > The reason we tried pymssql is because it is much easier to get > running on OSX. At the moment our efforts to get pyodbc working on > Macs have met with alot of frustration. > > However, we would have done things differently if we had seen > different wording in the SqlAlchemy docs. For instance, a notice > that binary fields do not work with pymssql. This would have put us > down the pyodbc path right away. Instead, I found the non-specific > statement in the MSSQL Known Issues section. I then searched for > what those issues were and found plenty of Unicode Type issues but > nothing really relating to Binary types. > > So, with all the above in mind we are proceeding down the pyodbc path. > > For the project, I am not asking for any work to be done on pymssql > but rather that the Known Issues section be clarified to state that > Binary Types do not work. the quickest path here would be for you to edit the wiki directly - log in as "guest/guest". We put the database issues there specfically so it could be a collaborative document drawing upon the communities' experience directly. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
