Without Foreign Keys or joins, I don't see how putting all tables in
the same domain buys you anything?

Laurence

On Jun 4, 12:27 am, enj <enjah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The way Simpledb works you don't want to make each domain a table, you
> want to put all related tables in one domain. This way you can do
> relational queries on the set of objects. One thing that might help
> conceptualize it would be to set a "table" attribute for each item
> that contains what the table name would be called. That way you could
> quickly get a resultset of all the objects that should be in that
> table. One can do any kind of relational operation on the set of
> objects in the domain, so sqlalchemy functionality can be mapped to
> it. Since transactions aren't supported that functionality wont be
> supported, but one can still make useful applications.
>
> Ian
>
> On Jun 3, 6:00 pm, Laurence Rowe <laurencer...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It would be interesting to see if this could be made to work. The
> > SimpleDB model is rather different from the relational model, so it
> > would only be useful if your application does not use any advanced
> > features - no joins etc, each 'domain' might map to one big (albeit
> > sparse) table.
>
> > Laurence
>
> > On Jun 3, 8:38 pm, enj <enjah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hello all,
>
> > > I am new to sqlalchemy and was introduced to it by a project (cjklib)
> > > that uses it. I want to migrate this project to Amazon SimpleDB and
> > > since it makes extensive use of sqlalchemy I thought the best course
> > > of action might be to make a SimpleDB dialect in sqlalchemy which
> > > could possibly benefit other projects trying to move to AWS.
>
> > > The purpose of my post is to see if there is any such effort out there
> > > or any other interest in this. Also I was wondering if there is any
> > > good docs/tutorials on implementing a Dialect.
> > > From my current understanding I plan to implement 
> > > engine.defaulthttp://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/browser/sqlalchemy/trunk/lib/sqlalchem...
> > > which will use the boto library to interface with 
> > > simpledbhttp://code.google.com/p/boto/
>
> > > Any thoughts?
>
> > > --
> > > Ian Johnson
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to