> mmmm, i think the contract of TypeDecorator is that you don't need to deal > with super(). But the funny thing about Interval is its already a > TypeDecorator, but the idea should be the same (in 0.5 too...)
Ya, I just had a look at the 0.5.8 docs; http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/05/reference/sqlalchemy/types.html#sqlalchemy.types.TypeDecorator and the example given is the second way. I can't find an example of the first way (subclassing & super) so it must have been something I hacked together which happened to work. Thanks Eoghan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
