Le 29/06/2012 16:14, Michael Bayer a écrit :
> On Jun 29, 2012, at 6:31 AM, tonthon wrote:
>
>> I had also to add :
>> c1 = aliased(Client)
>> c2 = aliased(Client)
> oh right, forgot that part
>
>> query(Task).with_polymorphic([Invoice, Estimation]).outerjoin(p1,
>> Invoice.project).outerjoin(p2, Estimation.project).outerjoin(c1,
>> p1.client).outerjoin(c2, p2.client)
>>
>> And I can filter on common parameters, that's what I was looking for so far.
>>
>> Is it possible to get Invoices and Estimations as result objects (in
>> place of Task objects) ?
> if the Estimation/Invoice classes use "polymorphic_on" against a column in 
> the Task table that acts as the "discriminator" then sure.
>
> if there isn't such a column, then things are trickier - we don't have a 100% 
> endorsed pattern for that right now.  there's hacky workarounds, id have to 
> work one up.
>
>
Ok, thanks a lot for all your explanations, I don't have any
polymorphic_on discriminator but I can try to insert one (an update sql
command line should be very easy to perform), it should make the trick.

Regards
Gaston


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.

Reply via email to