Yes, I don't use gevent now. Just trying to improve from sqlalchemy and mysql server itself.
It takes 50 ms to commit one entry update. I don't know reason exactly now. I'am trying to write mysql procedure and have a try to see the performace if calling procedure via python. 在 2014年3月13日星期四UTC+8下午11时55分49秒，Michael Bayer写道： > > OK well if you’re using gevent, then I really have very little experience > to help you on this. I wasn’t aware of what integration gevent has with > the MySQL drivers, I assume you’re using a pure Python driver at least. > It’s very likely there’s some interaction with gevent + MySQL drivers > getting in the way. That’s a pretty advanced configuration so you sort > of need to figure out how to get a handle on what it’s doing if you want to > roll that way. I love the idea of gevent but as far as real world use > cases, I’ve never had any. If i need parallelism i just throw up > multiprocessing and I’m done. But i know that’s just not exciting enough > for most people. > > you’d need to run what you’re doing under non-gevent, non-parallel > circumstances and get a baseline for how long a “commit” takes. > > On Mar 13, 2014, at 9:30 AM, Ni Wesley <nis...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > > I thought this before. > > But, actually, set to 0 is twice as fast as other settings, say, maybe 50, > really hard to understand. > > I tried to use gevent + sqlalchemy + mysqlconnector, but just a little > improve. > > Tomorrow I wanna write some mysql procedures and call the procedures , > instead of core sqls. > > 在 2014年3月13日星期四UTC+8下午8时59分34秒，Michael Bayer写道： >> >> >> On Mar 13, 2014, at 12:10 AM, Ni Wesley <nis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > We can see that, from the start point to end point, it takes 50 ms, >> including 40ms for engine commit. >> > >> > For 1000 entries, it takes 40 seconds, here I have one question, when >> 1000 connections are on-going, I watch the connections between tcp server >> and db server, >> > >> > via command watch -n 1 "netstat -anpto|grep dbserver_ip|wc -l", I find >> the spike value is just 26, actually, I gave 0 to engine pool_size, why it >> takes only 26? >> >> pool size as zero is a pretty bad setting here, it means for every >> connect/execute() it has to reconnect to the database from scratch, because >> connections aren’t pooled. >> >> taking off that setting and leaving at the default would help. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sqlalchemy+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > To post to this group, send email to sqlal...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> > . > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
