Thanks, i am trying to follow your answer but i want to respond to your
question.
i have one main schema ( like a public one ) whith general tables and in
others schemas are almost identicals, there is , sometimes a difference in
the number of tables ( some big module is active ) but tables are always
identical.
I have changed some Classes but i have this error.
InvalidRequestError: SQL expression, column, or mapped entity expected -
got '<class 'promogest.dao.User.User'>'
my first thought was to map two schema at the time ( the main one and the
company one ) but like i wrote before the query give me always the old
Class.
thanks
Il giorno lunedì 19 gennaio 2015 17:15:45 UTC+1, Michael Bayer ha scritto:
>
>
>
> M3nt0r3 <m3n...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Here, in the log i change the search_path to veterfarma that is the news
> scheme but the query is performed to ferchim. that is the first schema i
> choose on the app start.
> >
> > i have
> >
> > __table__ = Table('foo', metadata, schema=schema, autoload=True )
>
>
> 1. do not use bound metadata. I don’t recommend the use of bound
> metadata for any situation, and it is only in the docs in one place with a
> prominent warning that one should probably not use it.
>
>
> 2. do not place the “schema” directive into the Table. the schema for the
> Table will be None.
>
>
> >
> > in every Class Foo(Base)
> >
> > if i don't use schema in the definition i have a
> >
> > 2015-01-19 16:48:20,698 INFO sqlalchemy.engine.base.Engine
> {'table_name': u'foo'}
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > [...]
> > File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/engine/reflection.py", line
> 54, in cache
> > ret = fn(self, con, *args, **kw)
> > File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/dialects/postgresql/base.py",
> line 1933, in get_table_oid
> > raise exc.NoSuchTableError(table_name)
> > NoSuchTableError: foo
>
> 3. do not use any engine directly for any purpose other than to procure a
> Connection object. do not pass it to a Table for autoload, especially.
> When we get a Connection object, we always have to set a new search path
> on it.
>
> 4. it’s awkward that you have many schemas each with the same schema
> repeated, yet you want to use reflection - which schema do you wish to
> reflect? are all the schemas exactly the same ? if not, you’d need to
> map to each schema individually. Here, we will assume that *all schemas
> are completely identical*, that we can reflect just one of them and those
> tables will match all the other schemas.
>
> I’d recommend using DeferredReflection:
>
>
> docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/rel_0_9/orm/extensions/declarative/api.html#sqlalchemy.ext.declarative.DeferredReflection
>
>
>
> then to do the prepare:
>
> with engine.begin() as connection:
> connection.execute(“SET search_path …”)
> DeferredReflection.prepare(connection)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > i tried deleting the Articolo module from sys.modules but the project
> has 140 tables 20 in the promogest2 ( main scheme ) and the rest in the
> others.
> > with another very small project this way works but it is very ugly
> solution.
> >
> > Using one schema it worked well in the last 8 years.
> >
> > sorry to bother you again
> >
> > F.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Il giorno lunedì 19 gennaio 2015 02:43:06 UTC+1, Michael Bayer ha
> scritto:
> > the ‘schema’ is a fixed name within the Table object. If you want to
> work on a different schema on each request, set up search_path on the
> connection at the start of the request:
> >
> >
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/ddl-schemas.html#DDL-SCHEMAS-PATH
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > M3nt0r3 <m3n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a postgresql with many scheme, every schema is a company.
> > > I am trying to change the scheme to match the user is making the login
> or change the schema per subdomain. ( at wsgi level it already worked )
> > > when the first user make the login is ok , meta and mappers are there
> "mapped" to the right scheme but when i try to change scheme, (making some
> Metadata.clear() or other stuff) the mapper still return the old scheme. I
> think it is not possibe to map ALL the schemas in the DB because of the
> same name of the tables and of the Mapper Classes too.
> > > i am searching for some documentation, some advice
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "sqlalchemy" group.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to sqlalchemy+...@googlegroups.com.
> > > To post to this group, send email to sqlal...@googlegroups.com.
> > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy.
> > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "sqlalchemy" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to sqlalchemy+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> > To post to this group, send email to sqlal...@googlegroups.com
> <javascript:>.
> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
