I have some relationships setup that are based on outer joins. When the result of the outer join is NULL (ie. it won't join), instead of having a None for that field, I get an object with all None values for that field.
Is this as-designed? I can kind of understand why... but the way i"m looking at it right now, it would seem clearer if that relationship object was None. Is this possible? Or am I just looking at things wrong? Thanks -- SQLAlchemy - The Python SQL Toolkit and Object Relational Mapper http://www.sqlalchemy.org/ To post example code, please provide an MCVE: Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example. See http://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve for a full description. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
