sön 2006-06-11 klockan 16:12 +1200 skrev Doug Dixon: > Does this 2.6 directive need porting to 3.0?
Not yet. It isn't needed until ETag support is there.. Squid-3 still has the simplistic Vary support found in 2.5, where each unique varying request is cached separately even if the server responses are identical. Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
