lör 2008-11-29 klockan 01:40 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries: > Question then to the more informed, is it better to make StoreIOBuffer > accept a ssize_t or revert the patch?
Generally size_t should be used. ssize_t only exists to support return values <0 as errors.. > The reason for having it in the first place was that only one of a few > places in the code were doing a subtraction of two values then checking > for negatives. The rest were doing a subtraction and assuming that it > was always >= 0. I think those few should cast the result to ssize_t, or be rewritten to check for b < a instead of a - b < 0 Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
