2017-02-24 11:03 GMT+01:00 Victor Seva <notificati...@github.com>:

> @miconda <https://github.com/miconda> I'm thinking if sca can be
> redesigned and integrate the subscription part of it as a module like
> presence_sca using presence infrastructure.
>
> The thing is that presence has support for process only the body not for
> the headers and sca is adding Call-Info header to a bodyless NOTIFY reply.
>
> Is it worth the trouble to implement that in presence or should I just
> keep hacking into sca directly?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/781#issuecomment-282253011>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF36ZXYM7H46BGg_b5LwD_-oHN7rgfQbks5rfqsGgaJpZM4J8iuL>
> .
>

any thoughts?

Cheers,
Victor
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

Reply via email to