The biggest downside is that some activities are very slow to launch... especially on the XO.
-walter On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Bastien <bastiengue...@googlemail.com>wrote: > Hi all, > > Greg Smith <gregsmit...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I forgot that switching to a new activity puts a copy of the old one > > on the Journal (20+ e-mails on that subject alone last year!). > > This comment and Daniel's ones about the Keep button just make me wonder > why Sugar should allow several activities to be open at the same time. > > Any strong case where this can be relevant? > > Actually I'm not suggesting to ditch "switching" itself, I just realized > that switching could be "quit-and-fetch-another-activity-from-journal." > > Then it would make sense to have another instance of the activity stored > in the journal when "switching" to an activity. > > > FYI my philosophy is that the user is never "wrong". > > I have the same. And I've seen many instances with the XO where I had > to explain why children "shouldn't" launch more than 3 or 4 activities. > Hence this proposal. Perhaps you considered this idea before - in that > case I'm interested in reading thru the discussion. > > Thanks, > > -- > Bastien > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
