On 11/21/2009 08:56 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:36:54 +0100, Hartmut Figge wrote:
>> D. K. Kraft:
>> 
>>>Harmut, does one need the -no-remote parameter on both the 1.1.18 and the 2.0
>>>shortcuts?  Or does it suffice just to have it on the 2.0 shortcut?
>> 
>> I haven't tested this. When i need SM1 while running SM2 i start SM1
>> with -no-remote. Or when i need SM2 while running SM1 i start SM2 with
>> -no-remote.
> 
> Note: D. K. Kraft is on Windows. Hartmut is on Linux. On linux both 1.1
> and 2.0 support the -no-remote command line switch. On windows only 2.0
> recognizes the -no-remote switch.
> 
> For 1.1 on Windows you need to create a batch file along the lines of:
> 
> set MOZ_NO_REMOTE=1
> seamonkey.exe %1 %2 %3 %4.
> 

Actually, you might want to check again... '-no-noremote' works just
fine for me on Win2KPro in both 1.1.18 & 2.0. That is how I test both in
Windows via a VM (VirtualBox) at the same time so that I can easily compare.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to