M Gordon wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> Mark Berger wrote: >>> So why is it still included in the SM suite? >> >> I have absolutely no idea. You should write to the developers and ask! >> >>> It seems like it is >>> causing more problems than benefits from backwards compatibility. >> >> You are very correct. > > Beau, > > It could be that no one at SM knows how to remove it from the suite, and > still allow mail to compose messages in HTML.
That could be possible, and may also be why they don't update Composer. (Not that I would care, as I am a Plain Text email person.) > If they did figure out how to remove it without harm, would SeaMonkey > still be an Internet Suite? Would it be a suite if they removed Chat? > It seems logical that the SM development team leader could contact the > developer of BlueGriffin and talk about porting BG into SM. Possible, I suppose, but then they would be faced with needing to include "NIH". :-) -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
