On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:30:25PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > Just curious; why do you ever want to do s2ram instead of s2disk? > > I meant s2both, duh...
It's a waste of battery power. s2ram only takes about two seconds, alone the "snapshotting machine" takes at least 10 seconds on my machines. With suspend to RAM the machine is already woken up again while suspend to disk is not even writing. -- Stefan Seyfried \ "I didn't want to write for pay. I QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices \ wanted to be paid for what I write." SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg \ -- Leonard Cohen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
