> You couldn't possibly be saying that United States foreign policy is a
> high-handed double standard, could you?
> 
> Well.....you'd be right (or if your "left," you'd be right on target too).


 Todd, you tickle my funny bone but like I said, I don't
 really won't to hear this but some of the Vets mentioned the
 author William Blum who wrote http://www.killinghope.com 
 and when I asked they said he was credible.  

 This article also looked interesting -- 


 The Disinformation Age:
 How George W. Bush and Saint Colin of Powell are lying America into an
 unnecessary war � and what honest journalists can do about it
 By Dennis Hans
 Tuesday, 4 March 2003
 http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0303/S00011.htm 

 A few excerpts -- 

 There is a lying leader, a bit closer to home, to whom our news media should 
apply Rummy�s good advice.
 Not only does the leader lie, but so too do his top aides. And the news media, 
with rare exceptions,
 routinely pass along their lies as fact. The result is that the people of 
America are out of touch with
 the people of the world. Thus we�re far more willing than any other populace 
to launch an unprovoked
 attack on Iraq. Whereas the German and French people � and the populations 
ruled by governments siding
 with Uncle Sam � are reasonably well-informed and overwhelmingly opposed, 
Americans are reasonably
 well-disinformed. 

 More and more Americans are beginning to see just how crooked our 
straight-shooting president is.
 To further this awareness, and to caution citizens inclined to follow him into 
war, I review below
 23 �techniques of deceit� of Bush and his foreign-policy team. Some of these 
techniques I address
 at greater length in �Lying Us Into War� 
(http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0302/S00061.htm). 

 Powell And Bush�s �Techniques Of Deceit�...... 

 5) Withholding the key fact that destroys the moral underpinning of an 
argument. 
     Powell condemned Saddam�s �use of mustard and nerve gas against the Kurds 
in 1988� that killed
 �Five thousand men, women and children.� True, but he did so with the blessing 
at the time of many
 Reaganites who now serve Bush � including Powell. In 1988, �Secretary of State 
Colin Powell was then
 the national security adviser who orchestrated Ronald Reagan�s decision to 
give Hussein a pass for
 gassing the Kurds,� says former U.S. Ambassador to Croatia, Peter Galbraith in 
the Boston Globe
 ( http://www.boston.com/globe/magazine/2002/1215/coverstory_entire.htm).

 7) Exploiting the fact that the U.N., unlike the U.S. military you served for 
most of your life,
    doesn�t have a Code forbidding lying:
     Activist Jimmy Walter (walden3.org), who has taken out full-page �Powell 
Lied?� ads in the
 New York Times and other publications, reminds Powell what could have befallen 
him if he had been an
 active-duty general when he addressed the U.N. Walter cites Section 907, 
Article 107 of the Uniform Code
 of Military Justice, which addresses �False Statements�: 
     �Any person subject to this chapter who, with intent to deceive, signs any 
false record, return,
 regulation, order, or other official document, knowing it to be false, or 
makes any other false official
 statement knowing it to be false, shall be punished as a court-martial may 
direct.�
     It�s a good thing Powell is retired. But what about his boss, 
Commander-in-Chief Bush? Is the man who
 gives orders to the generals free to lie? Is he as immune from military 
justice as he appears to be from
 media justice? We now turn to Bush�s techniques, noting that Powell used some 
of these as well in his
 U.S. presentation. 

 11) Passive lying (doing nothing to prevent what you know to be a vile slander 
from lodging in the brains
      of unsuspecting citizens as truth):
     a) Chris Matthews, host of MSNBC�s Hardball, made the following important 
point a few weeks back
 (click here for transcript: http://www.msnbc.com/news/859673.asp), addressing 
retired general William
 Perry Smith:
     �According to the [January 2003] Knight Ridder poll . . ., the people that 
know the most about the
 situation in Iraq are least supportive of the war. The ones who are most 
ignorant, particularly those who
 believe that half the people who attacked us September 11 included Iraqi 
citizens, are for the war.
 So isn�t �more education� something that stops support for the war, General? I 
mean, the president is not
 winning on the facts. He�s winning, according to the polls, on those who don�t 
know the facts�. Well, don�t
 you think the president ought to make the case, General, that the American 
people, tell the American people,
 �You�re wrong, half of you out there who think that there were Iraqis who 
attacked us September 11.
 They weren�t Iraqis. I�ve got some other reason why I want to attack Iraq.� 
He�s never said that.
 Should he? Or should he allow himself to benefit from people�s ignorance?�
     Straight-shooting Bush prefers to benefit from the people�s �ignorance,� 
though �ignorance� is not
 quite the correct word. People are misinformed because they�ve been deceived 
by the Prague Connection
 lie countenanced by Bush and spread by his henchmen.  

 18) Misrepresentation/Invention.
     On Sept. 7, 2002, Bush claimed that the International Atomic Energy Agency 
released a report in 1998
 that Saddam was six months away from developing a nuclear weapon. No 1998 IAEA 
report made any such claim.
 Then a presidential spokesperson said Bush had referred to a 1991 report. 
Wrong again. Here�s what the IAEA
 actually reported in 1998: �There are no indications that there remains in 
Iraq any physical capability for
 the production of weapon-usable nuclear material of any practical 
significance� 
 (http://www.washtimes.com/national/20020927-500715.htm). 

 19) Withholding the key fact that would alert viewers that the purported grave 
threat is non-existent.
     Bush said in his October speech that Iraq was developing unmanned aerial 
vehicles (UAVs) that could
 target the United States. The president neglected to tell Americans that 
Saddam would have to transport
 these limited-range UAVs � undetected � across the ocean all the way to our 
coast. The odds of that
 happening start at a billion to one. 

 20) Creating in the public mind an intense but unfounded fear:
     �Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof � the 
smoking gun � that could come
 in the form of a mushroom cloud.� (October speech) No nukes, no long-range 
missiles, no Saddam-delivered
 �mushroom cloud� over America. 


 ________________________________

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to