On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:47:05PM -0700, Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:29:52PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 08:14:44PM +0000, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > > +int
> > > +uuidcmp(const struct uuid *uuid1, const struct uuid *uuid2)
> > > +{
> > > +
> > > + return (memcmp(uuid1, uuid2, sizeof(struct uuid)));
> > > +}
> >
> > This is unsafe. The function operation depends on the ABI properties
> > that there is no padding either between members, or at the end of
> > the structure. Why not use by-member comparision ?
>
> I interpreted the CTASSERT at the beginning of kern_uuid.c as a
> guarantee that no such padding will be present. kern_uuid.c also defines
> an alternate representation, struct uuid_private, and casts between the
> two.
I agree, your addition is consistent with the other code in kern_uuid.c,
which already depends on these features. At least it contradicts
to what compiler authors try to teach C language users.
BTW, does uuid_private low/mid/hi union split of ll depend on endianess ?
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
