Hi, > Arb is really awesome! I definitely recommend it for validated numerics to > anyone. I used it for a few small things and it plays very well with flint > too. >
Thanks, we should definitely look into this further. Considering that even in the thread of Thilina's proposal, it is being recommended to use dependencies in and around flint. Also after discussing with Ondrej, I've decided to shift the focus of my proposal from implementing just fast numeric methods to symbolically implementing some special functions and then using the fast numeric methods in their evaluation. So i have updated my proposal<https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2014-Application-Sushant-Hiray:-Extending-Elementary-Functions-CSymPy> accordingly. I would like to get your views regarding the current proposal. Also a more concrete advice on the scope of the project, if it is way too pessimistic/optimistic would be highly appreciated. Looking forward to hear from you. Regards, Sushant Hiray BTW: Maybe you want also have a look at http://www.mathemagix.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/b67d4ded-2e61-437e-8370-7d76029e046f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
