Hi WG, event though I seem to be the one comitting the most typos, I think I finally found one somewhere else. In 4.4.2 of 3195, it talks about relay modes in [1], which refers to 3164. It says e.g.
### However, for maximum compatibility, the device SHOULD format the CDATA of the message in accordance with Sections 4.2.1 through 4.2.3 of [1]. ### This reference is repeated. The only thing is there is no 4.2.1 to 4.2.3 in 3164. I think it should refer to 4.*1*.1 to 4.*1*.3. A bit later, it 3195 says: #### To be consistent with the spirit of [1], a relay receiving a message that does not contain a valid priority, timestamp or hostname will follow the same general rules as described in section 4.2.2 of [1] while including the exact contents of the received syslog packet as the CDATA. The values of the facility and severity will be construed #### Again, 4.2.2 does not exist in 3164, I assume this case 4.3 (as whole that is 4.3.1 to 4.3.3) is meant. Then, it says: #### As another example, consider a message being received that does not properly adhere to the conventions described in Section 4.2.2 of [1]. In particular, the timestamp has a year, making it a nonstandard format: #### I assume, this means 4.1.2. I am pulling my RFCs from http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfcNNNN.txt which should be the definite source. Something for the next revision? Rainer
