On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Tom Petch wrote:
B) As the document is technically inadequate as a standard for syslog over TLS,
we
would also benefit from a fresh start with an editor without H*** in their
e-mail address.
Tom Petch
Tom,
This is inappropriate.
First, remarks that discredit any group or company are not permitted
within the IETF. We make progress by seeking consensus. Attacking any
group or company will drive wedges between our group and I will not permit
it on this mailing list.
Second, Huawei has been complying with the rules specified in RFC 3979.
They have claimed some IPR in syslog-transport-tls; they have notified the
Working Group; and have specified their terms in the IPR claim repository.
Changing authors will not change the fact that Huawei has an IPR claim
associated with the work. The authors have been responsive and active in
seeking input and trying to gain consensus on the technical merits of the
document. I see no reason for them to be removed or replaced.
Please do not make comments of this nature in the future.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
