On 02.12.2010 23:11, Marius Tolzmann wrote:
hi again..
On 02.12.2010 22:34, Tom Gundersen wrote:
The unit files we use for Arch can be found here:
<https://github.com/falconindy/systemd-arch-units>.
They have not been tested as much as they should though, so there
might be bugs.
thanks @tom for the link.. it helped..
@all: after inspecting some unit files:
* sshd.socket is marked conflicting with sshd.service
* sshd.socket implicitly activates s...@.service since Accept=yes
(or Accept=true as mentioned in systemd.socket(5)) is set..
if both (sshd.service and sshd.socket) are enabled which one wins?
i know that this would be kind of a stupid configuration 8) but i
think it could be a scenario which may get me more into this
dependency thing without studying the sources:
is it sshd.socket because this one is activated in the sockets.target
and so before the mutli-user.target where sshd.service would be
activated?
or is it sshd.service which triggers stopping sshd.socket because
sshd.socket is marked conflicting with it?
and: does it matter where the conflict is defined?
AFAIK if any other unit would require one of those units that unit
would "win".. but just in case there is no such later requirement.. ..
marius..
p.s.: here is a link (which was sent to me directly via email) to some
units on Lennarts server http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-units/
(just in case anybody else is searching for some example units.. thx
to enaut)
doh... Some day I will learn to hit the "reply list" button instead of
"reply"... But either way I wasn't so sure about sending the archive to
the list... But either way. If anyone else is interested in the
exherbo-unit-archive just request it.
Well I just tried it and the sockets are started first and remain
active. Guess it is because the sockets are started very early and
systemd has a lazy starting policy (meaning only start what it really
has to). But starting sshd.service manually stops the sshd.socket.
enaut
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
