2011/4/3 Lennart Poettering <mzerq...@0pointer.de>: > On Sun, 03.04.11 23:28, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> > But for /dev/shm I see no quick fix... do you? >> >> Unfortunately not. No one foresaw that quota support on tmpfs will >> someday be useful :) >> >> > >> > I think we should fix either both or should wait for the proper fix by >> > the kernel. >> >> Can you temporarily fix one? > > Well, of course we could. > > But, think about it, what does this help? The vulnerability doesn't go > away by doing this, and we'd have a temporary hack in there, that we'd > have to remove later on again.
Systems who might run into problems with /dev/shm, can just add limits to /etc/fstab, and systemd will re-mount it and apply them. There should really be a _proper_ solution some day, be it quota or something else. We have way too many /tmp-like dirs, where users can just leave their crap behind and cause problems. This is really nothing new with systemd. Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
