On 01/23/2013 04:16 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sat, 19.01.13 04:24, poma (pomidorabelis...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> >> On 01/18/2013 07:23 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>> On Fri, 18.01.13 16:57, poma (pomidorabelis...@gmail.com) wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Bonne journée, >>>> >>>> If brackets can be of any help. >>>> Lennart, have you tested this *new* Fedora's setup, or is this some kind >>>> of zen puzzle? >>>> >>>> Once upon a time, Fedora 17 >>>> # CONFIG_DRM_UDL is not set >>>> CONFIG_FB_UDL=m >>>> multi-seat-x with udlfb.ko(DisplayLink kernel framebuffer driver) worked >>>> like a charm. >>>> >>>> Present time, Fedora 18 >>>> CONFIG_DRM_UDL=m >>>> # CONFIG_FB_UDL is not set >>>> multi-seat-x with udl.ko is broken. >>> >>> There have been some changes since the display link driver now is a >>> proper dri driver. We had tested that a while ago and there were some >>> issues but I thought they had all been fixed. I haven't tested this in >>> the 2 months or so since then. >> >> This sounds like something that was not a priority. Am I right? >> Yeah, I understand that udl supersede and "…is based in large parts on >> udlfb.c…"(Dave Airlie). > > We have a lot of stuff to do, and only limited work time. This stuff is > as much a priority as most other stuff we work on -- or as little, if you > will. > > It's open source. If this matters and is urgent to you best way is > usually to work on it yourself, otherwise you have to accept that people > will work according to their own work schedules. > > Sorry if that's disappointing. > > Lennart >
You're completely right ;) Ain't disappoint. Cheers, poma _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
