On Tue, 05.03.13 03:36, systemdki...@yopmail.com (systemdki...@yopmail.com) wrote:
> > Thank you Lennart. I wonder how your tip compares to our result? Our > method employs getty.target and local-fs.target. It works but we prefer > the Right Thing (tm). Would systemd-user-sessions.service be better for > any reason? Here's our unit as it sits. Thanks for your input. You really should order your stuff against s-u-s.s because otherwise your service is not guaranteed to finish before the first user logs in. > # /etc/systemd/system/ramhome-setup.service > > [Unit] > Description=Populate RAM user files from persistent store > After=local-fs.target After=local-fs.target is unnecessary, as that all normal services are implicitly ordered against local-fs.target anyway. Drop this. > [Service] > Type=oneshot > ExecStart=/usr/bin/rsync --archive /home/ramhome/ /ramhome > RemainAfterExit=no Redundant as that RemainAfterExit=no is the default. Drop this. > [Install] > RequiredBy=getty.target getty.target sounds like the wrong choice to pull this in from. That target is what we pull in our gettys from, and your service is not a getty, so drop this. Instead you might want to use multi-user.target, which is what was most normal services are pulled in from in multi-user and graphical mode. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
