On Tue, 12.05.15 19:29, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > All examples can be configured using drop-ins. Do we really need yet > another syntax now?
Well, even though units are all-powerful, I still believe that fstab is probably where most people will configure their stuff, simply because it's so much simpler to use. Now, of course, we shouldn't try to reimplement all possible settings that .mount unit files provide as fstab options. But the most obvious ones probably *do* make sense to add, and x-systemd.requires= is probably one of them. It's not only useful for stuff like overlayfs, but also pretty essential for things like ext3, ext4, xfs which support external journal logging devices, for which the mounts need to express dependencies: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164334 Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
