PC>> If I put it below, then it would come into my inbox, and I wouldn't know PC>> spampal had called it spam, since I don't change the subject. If I PC>> manually read it, and send it to spamcop, then I don't need spampal do PC>> I?
AM> Why don't you have the filter move the message to a spam folder? AM> I thought that was what your spam filters did? ok, if I used Spamcop filter, yes, I read the mail message, determine that it is spam, CTRL-ALT-S to send AND move it to a SPAM folder. This requires me reading the message, determining it is spam, and dealing with it. If I use spampal( popfile..) then I check mail, bring up the ticker, and see that there is already a message determined to be spam in the spam folder, so I can read it later, not read it, delete it, or I could also CTRL-ALT-S for spamcop, but that doesn't work since it is already moved to a spam folder. Am I trying to do too much? do I need spampal ( popfile) ? or do I need spamcop? I wish I could get spampal to identify it, and spamcop to send it, all without my having to deal with it:) Paul Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
