On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 03:43:10PM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> (more context restored)
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 09:51:48AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> >>>>>> (also, edquota and repquota seem fs-independent to me...)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> no, they're not: they can directly the quota1 file specified in the
> >>>>> fstab if quotactl fails or the filesystem is not mounted.
> >>>>
> >>>> That's a bug, or more accurately legacy behavior that doesn't need to
> >>>> be supported.
> >>>
> >>> of course it's not nice. But we're talking about existing code calling
> the
> >>> legacy quotactl. If we're going to change it to not check the fstab
> >>> options any more, we may as well change it to use libquota.
> >>
> >> I don't understand - surely edquota and repquota go through your
> >> proplib interface now?
> >
> > We were talking about code like netatalk, which is why I propose
> > a public library for this.
>
> Uh, now I really don't understand.
what don't you understand ?
--
Manuel Bouyer <bou...@antioche.eu.org>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
