On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 08:53:00AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> It is also moot. Provided that quota cleanup leaves me with enough
> time to merge and test (admittedly this is looking less and less
> likely), the ufs/lfs split will be in -6.
>
> (unlike the changes proposed in this thread, the ufs/lfs split has
> been in the works a long time and has been discussed with releng.)
You've been talking about it for some time, but I've never seen details
or patch about it on a public list. I couldn't find references to it
in the releng mail archives either.
Anyway, I've asked core and releng about ffsv2 extattr; nothing will
be commited before the branch; releng accepts to have different code
in HEAD and netbsd-6. So I'll come back on the topic after netbsd-6
has been branched.
--
Manuel Bouyer <bou...@antioche.eu.org>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
