On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:45:50 -0600, Brent Cook wrote: > Yeah yeah, a pointer is a pointer (except when it isn't :). I think this > looks nicer, since idx2peer is really the thing we're allocating to.
OK millert@ - todd
On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:45:50 -0600, Brent Cook wrote: > Yeah yeah, a pointer is a pointer (except when it isn't :). I think this > looks nicer, since idx2peer is really the thing we're allocating to.
OK millert@ - todd