Michael Forney wrote: > > + exit(fd != -1); > > While you're at it, I think this exit status is backwards. Currently > `doas -L` exits 0 if the open failed.
yeah, oops. fixed. thanks.
Michael Forney wrote: > > + exit(fd != -1); > > While you're at it, I think this exit status is backwards. Currently > `doas -L` exits 0 if the open failed.
yeah, oops. fixed. thanks.