Lukas Ruzicka <lruzi...@redhat.com> igorleak hau idatzi zuen (2019 mai. 14, ar. 14:12):
> > I am talking about the quorum, if there is a late discovered bug, that > would normally be considered a blocker, but because > > a) it could not be fixed on time, and > b) it is not as serious as it would prevent people from using Fedora anyway > > In this case, I think more people to decide is crucial because it keeps us > from letting bugs flow into releases *whenever *we might need to. If more > people decide that it is ok, then it is ok. > > What if any number of people in an IRC meeting could decide it? Then one > person could possibly decide it, too? Or two? Or three? Or how many at > least? And that is the quorum. Or do we say, it should be some percentage > of the present? Ok. > > Until now, we always used the "above 50%" which leaves a bitter > after-taste if you are in the "below 50" group. Therefore, I suggest more > than 50. So that it is clearly decided that we want that outcome. > > > That's 80% of votes, but just 16,67% of the total audience from your >> matrix. >> > > I do not understand which matrix do you mean? > The one on the previous mail. 4/25/19 meeting presence = 24. Positive votes to block: 4. Voting people, 5. That makes a 80% of total votes but just 16,67% of total presence. > The ksieve bug was reported by me in early February ... a long time before > Beta and Final. I did not propose it a blocker, because I thought, that > they would have fixed it a long time before Beta or Final. The did not. > However that is not a best example of an unexpected blocker jumping out of > nowhere. It was known for a long time. > Known or not, the bug was not proposed as blocker until aftet starting the go/no-go meeting, so imo it can be considered as a latter bug. Actually we resurrected this discussion due to that specific bug. > > I like that things are always decided by the community and with my > suggestion I cry for more community. > > Lukas > > > > _______________________________________________ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
