Folks,
- Some quick comments. We already have ways to integrate tiddlywikis with conversations using Disqus, Yammer and IntenceDebate. - I have being involved in discussions on all three of these with me offering a free Yammer network, - What I can tell you is despite us having these integrations very few have taken part in learning these and critically reviewing them. So it seems the problem can not yet be said to be the nature of any of these solutions, but the communities openness to try them. Some quick review comments of my own *Disqus* Successfully in use with gamers, has all the basic features but structures around simple groups, we would not want to increase too much in number. Has a TiddlyWiki client. *Yammer* Possibly the most interactive and most capable of collaborative documents, spawning special interest groups but whilst free access is available be granted it is on top of a proprietary Microsoft platform. One which ultimately we can't extend or replace should it go the way of the dodo (although we can export the data). Personally I have experience with 45,000 member Yammer groups and are very experienced with them. Integrates with Microsoft cloud solutions. *IntenceDebate* I like this because it comes from the same crowd as WordPress which is one of the best open platforms and means it can also integrate with many websites, open ID and and user management can be used, Has a TiddlyWiki client. *Discord* I need to learn more. *In general* Whatever the solution including GG we need to develop ways to move conversations to a "curated" reference information repository. To my mind the only platform that is conversation and repository is Yammer, so all the others need two solutions. I would like to see Tiddlywiki be the curated repository so I think it is critical any solution can be integrated with independent tiddlywiki's. This is worthy of a thread of its own. *My Personal view* A hybrid solution with TiddlyWiki's on a PHP Server with wordpress and IntenceDebate however allowing any wiki to leverage any community discussion forum, as long as we know which is focused on what special interest area.Leverage the user backend to support edit access to online wikis, and build a repository of Tiddlywiki objects (this is the way to extract reference material from the conversations). Valuable content could then be submitted to a community repository form all available forums and wikis and migrated to TiddlyWiki solutions as they become available because we have a repository. Regards Tony On Wednesday, October 2, 2019 at 2:38:37 AM UTC+10, ILYA wrote: > > Hello, > > I know that there is a parallel discussion thread is ongoing about GG. > However it was mentioned there that alternative solutions are off topic. I > do believe that there are better alternatives. One of which is discourse > (but there are others). One example of a forum powered by discourse is > https://forums.foundationdb.org. Discourse has tagging support which > would allow us to find information easier. The software itself is open > source and has API to access it programmatically. The discourse.org > offers free service for open source projects. In comparison to GG we can > backup the forums data and restore it on different hosting if we decide to > leave. > > Best regards, > iilyak > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/10ba120d-e0a5-4158-9861-e7b758bc278d%40googlegroups.com.
