Alright. Sounds good. I'm in. :-) Best regards, Rick C. Hodgin
-------- Original Message -------- From: Michael Matz <matz....@frakked.de> Sent: Sun, May 27, 2012 04:49 PM To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org CC: Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] question about bit-fields >Hi, > >On Sun, 27 May 2012, Rick Hodgin wrote: > >> Didier, >> >> You're able to take the code and modify that requirement. It seems >> straight-forward enough that TinyCC is (in memory at compile-time) >> determining the target size, regardless of the storage size, and using >> that for the storage size in memory. You could alter that code to >> always use the smallest storage-size, and automatically upsize to the >> larger form, such as something stored as 1..7 bits always being stored >> as a single byte, even if it's scoped as an int. > >If one changes anything at all then it only makes sense to change it so as >to be layout compatible with GCC. A third layout (GCC, TCC-old, TCC-new) >wouldn't help. Although the rules of GCC are relatively obscure and >complex in corner cases. > > >Ciao, >Michael. > >_______________________________________________ >Tinycc-devel mailing list >Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org >https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
