Hi, > > If one changes anything at all then it only makes sense to change > > it so as to be layout compatible with GCC. A third layout (GCC, > > TCC-old, TCC-new) wouldn't help. Although the rules of GCC are > > relatively obscure and complex in corner cases. > > Actually I have to correct myself here. After studying the layout > code a bit I see that TCC implements mostly microsoft's bit-field > layout. We don't want to get rid of that capability, so GCCs layout > (which is PCC layout for i386 and arm AAPCS, and funky layout for > legacy arm) would have to be implemented in addition.
OK, I'll give it a try during the next week. Regards, Didier
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
