Le jeudi 14 février 2013 20:21:30, Ramsay Jones a écrit :
> Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > Le mercredi 13 février 2013 19:08:37, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit :
> >> Le mercredi 13 février 2013 17:16:28, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit :
> >>> On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:30:14 -0700, arn...@skeeve.com wrote:
> >>>> "Thomas Preud'homme" <robo...@celest.fr> wrote:
> >>>>> Why not but strike multiarch from that as I don't see how we could
> >>>>> detect it by compiling a C program.
> >>>>
> >>>> Use the output of ldd to tell you where the C library is.
> >>>
> >>> Yep true, I thought about it last night and forgot about it in the
> >>> morning. However I just pushed a commit using checking where is crti.o
> >>> before reading your mail. It's a one line test so I think the solution
> >>> is not too bad but you can prove me wrong of course.
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot for the suggestion. Thinking about it a bit I managed to
> >> come up with a much better patch. It's not totally done though but I
> >> have to leave. I'll push it tonight. Stay tuned.
> >
> > Pushed. And the diffstat from the original situation (before my 2 commits
> > to
>
> > reorganize) is also better. See for yourself:
> OK, despite what I said, I fetched commit e298f608 ("Create config-print
> program to test $cc", 13-02-2013) last night in order to test it.
> [Sorry for not reporting the results last night, but I desperately
> needed to get some sleep!]Of course, no need to be sorry for that. > > Unfortunately, the news is not good! :( Using ldd has broken the build > again and my x86 is apparently a bigendian machine! :-P This should be fixed by grischka's commit: 944627c479f01d919f10f9d9dd807cca43bf7aba Best regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
