Gcc and msvc are correct. -----Original Message----- From: tinycc-devel-bounces+michael=theessentialexchange....@nongnu.org [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+michael=theessentialexchange....@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of jiang Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 9:37 PM To: Thomas Preud'homme Cc: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [Tinycc-devel] 回复: tcc grammar problems
I am sorry, I do not have expressed good I mean. I want you sure, is tcc correct or gcc msvc correctly. If the gcc msvc correct, I want to fix it. Best regards Jiang Thomas Preud'homme <robo...@celest.fr>编写： >Le dimanche 13 juillet 2014, 22:12:39 jiang a écrit : >> Hello everyone! >> >> (s->a = (s->b = (s->c = n + 4))); >> >> >> gcc & msvc: >> --> 30 / 30 / 126 // Because the return value is left >> >> >> tcc >> --> 254 / 30 / 126 // Because the return is the right value > >Since it works for the last two values I don't think it's that. It >simply looks like tcc compute n + 4 (254) and then tries to store it in >each field independently. It's a folding issue. Tcc records 254 in a >CValue associated with the SValue for n + 4. The problem is how this is >propagated (folded) to the three field access. > >> >> Shall tcc assignment modify what? Same with gcc&msvc. > >Yes, gcc and msvc are definitely right here. > >Best regards, > >Thomas _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
